Showing posts with label Ideology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ideology. Show all posts

Newstart participants explain what a $75 a week increase would mean to them

Posted on 09 August 2019 by Nico Bell • 0 Comments
ACOSS have surveyed Newstart recipients asking what a $75 a week increase in payment would mean to them. The answers are a heartbreaking indictment of a wealthy country that allows vulnerable people to go hungry and scared whilst increasing the coffers of the wealthy.

“I would have enough to rent privately and get out of this abusive situation of where I live.”
“I could get more food for my kids.”      
“I would be able to replace clothing which has worn through use.” 
“I would be able to keep my car, which would increase my chances of getting work!”
“I’d be less afraid of the postman (and the bills he brings)!”
“I could feel like a human again.” 

Neoliberalism has been a political success but an economic failure

Posted on 07 August 2019 by Nico Bell • 0 Comments


More essential reading... excellent long read by Robert Kuttner of American Prospect.

"Neoliberalism’s premise is that free markets can regulate themselves; that government is inherently incompetent, captive to special interests, and an intrusion on the efficiency of the market; that in distributive terms, market outcomes are basically deserved; and that redistribution creates perverse incentives by punishing the economy’s winners and rewarding its losers. So government should get out of the market’s way.

Now, after nearly half a century, the verdict is in. Virtually every one of these policies has failed, even on their own terms. Enterprise has been richly rewarded, taxes have been cut, and regulation reduced or privatized. The economy is vastly more unequal, yet economic growth is slower and more chaotic than during the era of managed capitalism. Deregulation has produced not salutary competition, but market concentration. Economic power has resulted in feedback loops of political power, in which elites make rules that bolster further concentration.


The culprit isn’t just “markets”—some impersonal force that somehow got loose again. This is a story of power using theory. The mixed economy was undone by economic elites, who revised rules for their own benefit. They invested heavily in friendly theorists to bless this shift as sound and necessary economics, and friendly politicians to put those theories into practice."


AlterNet

Limitless funds for empathy for the privileged

Posted on 30 July 2019 by Nico Bell • 0 Comments

The anti-elite backlash and the rise of stupidity as policy

• 0 Comments
As Isaac Asimov once sagely stated 

"The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”

That was in 1980 and I think we can all agree it has gotten much worse. We see it in anti vaxxers, climate change deniers, the belief that Muslims are overtaking the West, even a million Facebook nostalgia pages reflecting how life was better when the Boomers were young, forgetting that sexism, racism, poverty and disease were even more a part of life then than now. Anyone is allowed to have an opinion on anything. Anyone can decide they have the right to have their opinion taken seriously. Andrew Bolt is an authority on climate change. Pauline Hanson gets media time for her opinions on Uluru. Soon I expect to see this:




This article from Tom Nichols, professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, looks at the phenomenon in more depth. I don't agree with his conclusion it's partially due to the entitlement of millennials - when everything really started to go downhill was when Baby Boomers discovered the comment section. But it's an interesting look at how we got here, and how we might get away.


The Federalist

Robodebt Robbery

Posted on 27 July 2019 by Nico Bell • 0 Comments
Person Holding Red Box


Bell Epoch isn't a personal blog. I already have one of those. This blog is for news and commentary on social issues. But I find myself at the centre of a social issue right now. I've got a Robodebt story, and this one's a doozy.

If you're not familiar, Robodebt is the government's practice of using data matching software to find discrepancies between information clients have provided to Centrelink to claim payments, and data from other government agencies such as the tax office and child support agencies. I hate to break your faith in the information technology capabilities of the government that can't even get the Census right, but Robodebt has come up with lots and lots of errors. Robodebt has the delightful habit of seeing a Newstart recipient has picked up a few weeks of work, deciding they must have earned that much every week all year, and slapping them with a debt for the government payments that Robodebt decided the person wasn't entitled to because the computer has decided they were working when they weren't.

Look, it's kind of fair that the government wants to get money people claimed when they weren't entitled to it back. The problem is Robodebt shoots first and asks questions later. Debts are automatically issued with no warning, no explanation, and little chance to challenge or appeal. And if Robodebt decided there's a debt, they can just help themselves to your money and good luck getting it back. 

In my case, I've been issued a debt no one can explain or justify, and only found out about when Centrelink helped themselves to my $2,500 tax return. 

Back in January, I got a letter telling me I had a $7,800 debt for overpayment of Family Tax benefit dating back to 2015. Wait, what? This was when I was freshly separated from my husband. I'd lost just about everything I owned, was at uni, not working, and had 25% care of my son. I was scraping by on Austudy and a partial family tax benefit and after paying rent, often had to choose between the train to uni and food. But I was scrupulously honest and accurate in what I told Centrelink. Now the government decided I had too much money back then? I called them. No one could tell me why there was a debt but they promised it would be appealed and someone could get back to me. 

So I left it there. I've had a lot of stuff going on this year, and it did kind of slip my mind. I'm working full time, not on Centrelink payments at all, and don't log into My Gov much cause I've no need to. Apparently Robodebts can be enforced to stop you leaving the country but I had no issues doing so in May. I got another letter at some stage saying I had a $300 debt, and figured my initial debt had been reviewed and reduced to that amount. Fine, I didn't know what the debt was but by now would probably have paid it to save myself dealing with them.

Fast forward to July. I completed my tax return, looked forward to a decent refund of $2,500, which was needed for...stuff. I don't earn a tonne of money, live pretty frugally (my American trip this year was done on the cheap...two star hotels, all public transport and walking, eating one meal a day plus apples and chips) and really needed my tax back, not to mention my beloved 16 year old cat needs thyroid treatment. I spent most of my monthly pay from work paying off some outstanding debts cause hey, tax refund coming soon right?

On the 17 July I got a My Gov letter telling me the original debt stood, now bumped up to $8000 with interest.

On the 18 July, the ATO processed my tax refund and transferred it all to Centrelink to pay off my debt.

So I've been calling. On 19 July the Centrelink debt team told me apparently, maybe, the debt was for overpayment of rent assistance. Wait, what? Where are you saying I falsely claimed rent assistance? I asked what addresses they had on file for me, and the guy on the phone read out my addresses and the dates I lived there - which was the completely accurate info I gave them at the time, along with my leases. Apparently though, they'd look into it, and if I gave them all my rental information again maybe the debt would be waived. Also just maybe I could get some of my tax refund back whilst it was being appealed. So I tracked down and uploaded all my rental info again, along with bills to support why I needed the money back. 

I also emailed several politicians, including my local member Tanya Plibersek. The only one I heard back from was Senator Rachel Siewert, the Greens Senator from WA, who has been doing great work campaigning against the shitty Robodebt system. Her office has been absolutely lovely, and will raise my case with a review officer.

And I started getting angry. How very dare they just announce a debt and take my money. Right at tax time - suspicious much? How can a stupid computer algorithm raise a debt and take my money with no chance for me to appeal first?

This Thursday 25 July I rang Centrelink again. The debt recovery team told me I'd have to speak to the families line. The families line weren't entirely sure why the debt had been raised, but they seemed to think it might be related to my child care percentage from 2015-2017. So now if I want to challenge the debt, I have to try and prove how often my son was in my care years ago, in the period immediately after the end of my marriage, when I was forced against my will to leave my son with his father. As the 2.5 hour call came to an end, they also told me my case wasn't being appealed from the call six days prior, but they'd raised an appeal now, and oh yeah, you can't get any money back in the meantime.

And that was where I lost it. 

I have to go back to the most painful time in my life - separated from my child, one of the worst things that can happen, a horror so raw I mostly block it from my mind - and try to prove the pitiful amount of time I got to spend with him, when I wish it had been all the time. 

I felt the life I had built for myself, working, budding as a stand up comedian, a lovely home, hope when I haven't had hope for so long - crumbling away. I had worked so hard for nothing. I was rewarded for having a go by the government making my money go away. 

I am broke until I get paid in two weeks - I'm not asking for anything and I'm not crowdfunding. I want my money back. The trouble is I can't even precisely challenge the debt because no one can tell me the data mismatch that triggered it. No one can tell me exactly what the debt is for. The government won't divulge the discrepancies in data matching they look for, for fear people will exploit it.

They're free to exploit us though. All of us. Robodebt is extortion. No other organisation can decide you have a debt, refuse to fully explain it, and steal your money leaving you scrambling to work out why let alone get it back.

Right now I'm waiting. Waiting for the appeal, waiting for my complaint to be responded to*, waiting in hope Senator Siewert's office can get somewhere I haven't been able to. And I'm at an advantage here. I have a degree in social policy and a decent knowledge of the political system. What of the people who don't have that particular bureaucratic literacy? Robodebt targets the vulnerable, and worse; it targets those who have been on government payments and gone on to working, stealing what they earned away.

Sometimes I feel like I'll end up like this guy. I don't want to. I don't want any of this. I just want my money back. People have mentioned legal action, class actions; I'm not thinking that far ahead. I'm so heartsick sometimes I'm battling one hour at a time, and even if I get my money back it's been so utterly shitty.

* If you have received a Robodebt, do make a formal complaint. The government has used the low rate of complaints to prove "the system is working". Thousands of complaints might get their thumb off the scale a bit. 

Arguing for an Australian Green New Deal

Posted on 24 July 2019 by Nico Bell • 0 Comments
Green new deal, AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez



Excellent article arguing that Australia needs a Green New Deal of its own to counteract the problems of inequality, unstable employment and environmental recklessness plaguing this country. It is long past time for centrism. We need to state what we need and fight for it

A call for a return to love in progressive politics

Posted on 21 July 2019 by Nico Bell • 0 Comments
I don't agree with all of this - where was Obama's love when he was ordering drone strikes at civilian targets - but interesting points to consider. I'm definitely an advocate of people on opposite sides of the political spectrum actually meeting as people.


RECENT POSTS