New York magazine proclaimed 2024 the year of the bisexual. (And also the year of the knitfluencer, whatever the hell those are - a new type of martini?). Anyway, you mean I was on trend all year and didn't know it? What do I do now it's 2025 and I'm so last year? I wish I'd known it was my year before the year was over; when you're a middle aged schlub whose primary concerns in clothing choice are comfort and it covering my problem areas (which is all of my areas), opportunities to be part of the Zeitgeist are fleeting and must be seized.
Showing posts with label 2004 Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2004 Election. Show all posts
Link Wednesday: the year that was 2024...and 2004
Posted on 01 January 2025
by Nico Bell
• 0 Comments
2004 Election Howard Government Link Wednesday sexuality
2004 Election Howard Government Link Wednesday sexuality
Why I never became a social media star
Posted on 28 November 2017
by Nico Bell
• 0 Comments
2004 Election 2017 SSM Plebiscite Blogging Federal Politics Media
2004 Election 2017 SSM Plebiscite Blogging Federal Politics Media
Hey guys! I've been offline for so long. It was intended to be just an internet free (or internet less) time while I was doing my exams, but then I started having a series of painful issues with my internet provider. I won't bore you with the details but I was offline for three weeks. Don't worry though I have heaps of amazing posts I'm so excited to be able to share with you do social media personalities know how fake and ridiculous that sounds when they say it. I can't write like this.
Remembering Mark Latham
Posted on 06 April 2017
by Nico Bell
• 0 Comments
2004 Election Australian Labor Party Australian politics Federal Politics Howard Government Media
2004 Election Australian Labor Party Australian politics Federal Politics Howard Government Media
Mark Latham just won't go away. Our once almost Prime Minister now staggers about the public discourse like a drunk that has been ejected from every pub in town - even the most disreputable of dives that'll take anyone - and denied a chair on which to perch and share his incoherent ramblings, he's set up himself outside, regaling the public with his largely unwelcome rants.
The Ten Point Plan For A Better Australia
Posted on 13 September 2006
by Nico Bell
6• Comments
2004 Election Australian politics Howard Government
2004 Election Australian politics Howard Government
From the "silly" files...Kim Beazley has copped a lot of flack from all sides for his proposal that everyone who visits Australia would have to agree on their visa application to respect Australian values whilst they are here. Merely obeying Australian laws is not enough. Tourists would also need to agree to show respect for women, tolerance and mateship.
Now, I do believe that those who wish to settle permanently in Australia need to make an effort to integrate and respect our way of life. But how does making visitors agree to this help us any? How would it work anyway? Nearly five million foreign visitors come to Australia each year. Who is going to monitor whether they're respecting Australian values? Imagine a situation where the "values police" board a tour bus and pull a guy off, saying to him, "Whilst in Australia, you've been keeping to yourself and not making friends with the rest of the tour group. You're not displaying 'mateship', as you agreed to do on your tourist visa application. Therefore, we're going to have to deport you."
And Australia would become an international laughing stock.
I have written previously about the difficulty of defining Australian values. The Chaser has solved the problem, with a proposed Australian values statement:
I promise during my visit to Australia that I will:
- Respect other cultures, if completely assimilated into Australia's own.
- Respect other religions as long as they're not fundamentalist (except Christianity)
- Respect parliamentary democracy, as long as I have a majority in the Senate.
- Respect Australian institutions such as Don Bradman, Phar Lap, Steve Irwin and Peter Brock.
- Respect the equal treatment of women, except when depicted in Ralph, FHM and ZOO. I note that 'equal' does not extend to pay, hiring policies, seats in parliament or adequate childcare facilities.
- Respect hard work, especially when directed towards avoiding tax.
- Respect Australia's Laws, and also its Jones and its Mitchell.
- Respect Australia's armed forces, no matter where America may deploy them.
- Respect Australia's parliaments, except the 'fun-sized' NT and ACT parliaments, which no-one respects.
- Above all respect Australians' most important value – the value of their mortgage repayments.
On a serious note though, if Beazley wants to regain "middle Australia", he's not going to do it on issues of national security (my polite way of saying, pandering to people's fears). The Democrats trying to be the Republicans didn't work in the USA, and Labor trying to be the Liberals hasn't, and isn't going to, work here. Labor needs to concentrate on where it can gain ground; the issues that affect peoples day-to-day lives, like the IR laws. We're just over a year away from the federal election, and I don't want my afro-wig run to be on hold for another four years...
Mark Latham, You Bloody Idiot!
Before I start this post, let me just say I'm on the record here as having been a staunch Latham supporter in the past.

Latham, mid-2004
That's all over now. Shall we proceed...
Well, Mark Latham, former leader of the Federal Labor party who resigned in January,
four months after losing the election, has published his diaries, basically spewing
venom at Labor, the Liberals, the Federal Press Gallery, and everyone else. Normally for a story like this, I'd have links so you could read all this yourselves, but I must say,
this has been one of the hardest stories to Google that I've ever done. Links are broken or missing (for example, the official Pariliament house website's link titled "Member for Werriwa gives you this), and where active, are often to subscription-only newspaper services.
Now, I haven't read the book yet. No one has; it isn't released until Wednesday, and
excerpts have been tightly controlled. But I have read his From The Suburbs, and
you can find my review in my December archive on the 14th (sorry, no post permalinks) and I wonder if the diaries will have such a turgid style. But I did see the Enough Rope interview last night, and I think that all that needs to be said is there. It's being re-broadcast next Monday at 9:30pm; also there's apparently going to be a transcript on the website, as soon as Legal gives the all-clear (News Limited apparently tried to block the screening last night as they hold exclusive serialisation rights to the diaries over the weekend).
So I'll let you make your own judgements on that. My remarks at this stage (and this will make sense if you've read or seen the interview) is, "Mark, your family is not the entire Universe...you could easily have made a statment after the tsunami. And yes, you have driven people away from Labor. If you hate them so much, why are you still a member?"
Hasn't someone aged?
Latham, September 2005.

Latham, mid-2004
That's all over now. Shall we proceed...
Well, Mark Latham, former leader of the Federal Labor party who resigned in January,
four months after losing the election, has published his diaries, basically spewing
venom at Labor, the Liberals, the Federal Press Gallery, and everyone else. Normally for a story like this, I'd have links so you could read all this yourselves, but I must say,
this has been one of the hardest stories to Google that I've ever done. Links are broken or missing (for example, the official Pariliament house website's link titled "Member for Werriwa gives you this), and where active, are often to subscription-only newspaper services.
Now, I haven't read the book yet. No one has; it isn't released until Wednesday, and
excerpts have been tightly controlled. But I have read his From The Suburbs, and
you can find my review in my December archive on the 14th (sorry, no post permalinks) and I wonder if the diaries will have such a turgid style. But I did see the Enough Rope interview last night, and I think that all that needs to be said is there. It's being re-broadcast next Monday at 9:30pm; also there's apparently going to be a transcript on the website, as soon as Legal gives the all-clear (News Limited apparently tried to block the screening last night as they hold exclusive serialisation rights to the diaries over the weekend).
So I'll let you make your own judgements on that. My remarks at this stage (and this will make sense if you've read or seen the interview) is, "Mark, your family is not the entire Universe...you could easily have made a statment after the tsunami. And yes, you have driven people away from Labor. If you hate them so much, why are you still a member?"
Hasn't someone aged?

Latham, September 2005.
The End of Latham
SIX slogans under consideration for Kim Beazley's tilt at the ALP leadership:
1. Old sensation.
2. It's Time – No, really.
3. At least I'm not Mark Latham.
4. At least I'm not Paul Keating.
5. Kim Beazley – Third Time Lucky.
6. My eyebrows are better than John Howard's.
There's only one thing to talk about now...the Labor leadership crisis. Now, as many of you will know, I was tremendously excited about six months ago, when Labor looked quite invincible in the polls. Us Lefties felt that for the first time in nearly nine years, we were going to have a Labor government. Now, a disclaimer. I KNOW Labor is very far from perfect. Yes they take funds from "big business". Yes they still oppose gay marriage and support mandatory detention for asylum seekers. But, well, they're not the Liberals. Yes, many people are sick of Labor's indecisiveness and have switched to the Greens (pre-GST they also went for the Democrats, but I think we can agree, the Democrats are completely spent as a political force in this country). But I'm a realist. The Greens will never be able to form a government and so we shouldn't split the Left vote. What Labor and the Greens should do is agree to a range of social, environmental and economic policies in return for Greens support of Labor and limited, power-sharing concordances.
Anyway, after so many years in the political wilderness, what gave us this hope? Mark Latham. He's young. Good-looking. Charismatic. He wanted to say "Sorry". He wanted to bring the troops home. But what appealed to me the most, was that he appeared to be someone who would fight for principles, and Federal Labor has been sorely lacking that since Paul Keating was dumped. So, I at least was lured out of my agnostics cave to believe, we could win this one, last October.
Well now history shows I was wrong. I will always remember the weekend of October 9/10 2004 as one of the saddest of my life. I think I actually took it personally. Because, it seemed to me that the electorate had become so materialistic and conservative that Australia was saying "Okay...John Howard lied to us...time and time again. But hey - better that than our interest rates going up!"
And to witness Mark Latham in those days was wrenching. He looked like I felt - devastated, shell shocked. BUT, as Labor Leader he couldn't afford to feel sorry for himself, he had to get back to fighting the Coalition. And that didn't happen. Still, I can't believe it has come to this (latest from ABC news on-line):
Latham about to quit, Carr says
A senior Labor figure expects Mark Latham to quit as the federal Opposition Leader due to ill health, possibly within the next 24 hours.
New South Wales Premier Bob Carr has fuelled speculation, saying Mr Latham's recent silence means he has reached a decision to stand down.
Mr Latham has been ill due to severe pancreatitis.
Mr Carr says that if Mr Latham steps down it would be in the best interests of the Labor Party.
He reckons other Labor supporters agree.
Mr Carr is also backing a former federal leader in any leadership spill.
"Well obviously Kim Beazley is available, and he provides the Labor Party with a very obvious choice," he said.
On Southern Cross Radio, Labor frontbencher Wayne Swan also endorsed Mr Beazley.
He says the sooner Mr Latham clarifies his position the better.
Labor's foreign affairs spokesman Kevin Rudd says the Labor Party could become a laughing stock if the crisis is not resolved immediately.
"I'm not going to say black is white and white is black and pretend our current circumstances are in anyway flash, they're not," he said.
"But what we are all needing to see is for Mark to clarify his position and what I think the national leaders of the party at the state level are trying to do is to underline the urgency of that occurring."
Tuesday, January 18, 2005. 12:15pm (AEDT)
I'm not going to speculate about what Latham should or should not have done over the last few weeks, because as much as it pains me to say it, it seems too late for that now. What I am more concerned about is Kim Beazley.
Look, I think most Australians would agree, Beazley is an obviously intelligent, compassionate human being. But do such qualities make a good Parliamentary Leader (some would argue that by definition. leaders must not be human beings at all). Small-l liberals are notorious for just giving in (witness the US Democrats cedeing the 2000 Presidential election). And the fact remains...Beazley has lost two elections. Well, sort of. You may or may not remember, but in the 1998 poll (the "GST election" also the first I voted in) Labor actually won more votes overall, but the Coalition took more seats. Anyway, the Liberals were back in. That hurt, but not too much - I was kind of idealistic at the time and anyway, everyone was sure there'd be a backlash once the GST was introduced.
Well, there was no backlash, and then of course there was the events leading up to the 2001 election...I knew there was no hope Labor would win that. Last October though...finally, I thought, John Howard has to go? Surely people have had enough of the lies and the secrecy and Costello-in-the-wings?
Sadly no.
So, I guess the real question now is, could Beazley possibly win the 2007 election? Impossible from here to say, of course. If a week is a long time in politics...well, so much could happen between now and then. One thing does stand out in my mind though. By the next election Beazley will be 60.
A best case scenario of course would be Latham saying "I'm determined to take Labor to the next poll, we will fight hard and we will prevail, and I want you all with me".
But, that seems as likely as me taking up pig shooting. Then there's the prospect of Beazley caretaking for maybe a year, until one of the younger front benchers - Rudd, Swan, Tanner, Gillard? - is deemed to have "earned their stripes" and takes over, maybe to challenge Abbott or Costello at the poll.
There are no easy answers I can see. But I hope I've given you a little to think about, and your opinions on any of this would be most welcome.
Update - 17:30
Well as soon as I published this post I walked home (5 minutes), turned on ABC news radio, and heard straight away, the news. That Latham was resigning, both as Labor Leader and as an MP.
It's a sad day.
I stayed glued to the radio, listening to the fallout and press conference. Beazley's conference did hearten me, he sounded determined and resolute, so I will put my support there. Rudd gave a press conference too, but he was vauge and refused to commit to running.
1. Old sensation.
2. It's Time – No, really.
3. At least I'm not Mark Latham.
4. At least I'm not Paul Keating.
5. Kim Beazley – Third Time Lucky.
6. My eyebrows are better than John Howard's.
There's only one thing to talk about now...the Labor leadership crisis. Now, as many of you will know, I was tremendously excited about six months ago, when Labor looked quite invincible in the polls. Us Lefties felt that for the first time in nearly nine years, we were going to have a Labor government. Now, a disclaimer. I KNOW Labor is very far from perfect. Yes they take funds from "big business". Yes they still oppose gay marriage and support mandatory detention for asylum seekers. But, well, they're not the Liberals. Yes, many people are sick of Labor's indecisiveness and have switched to the Greens (pre-GST they also went for the Democrats, but I think we can agree, the Democrats are completely spent as a political force in this country). But I'm a realist. The Greens will never be able to form a government and so we shouldn't split the Left vote. What Labor and the Greens should do is agree to a range of social, environmental and economic policies in return for Greens support of Labor and limited, power-sharing concordances.
Anyway, after so many years in the political wilderness, what gave us this hope? Mark Latham. He's young. Good-looking. Charismatic. He wanted to say "Sorry". He wanted to bring the troops home. But what appealed to me the most, was that he appeared to be someone who would fight for principles, and Federal Labor has been sorely lacking that since Paul Keating was dumped. So, I at least was lured out of my agnostics cave to believe, we could win this one, last October.
Well now history shows I was wrong. I will always remember the weekend of October 9/10 2004 as one of the saddest of my life. I think I actually took it personally. Because, it seemed to me that the electorate had become so materialistic and conservative that Australia was saying "Okay...John Howard lied to us...time and time again. But hey - better that than our interest rates going up!"
And to witness Mark Latham in those days was wrenching. He looked like I felt - devastated, shell shocked. BUT, as Labor Leader he couldn't afford to feel sorry for himself, he had to get back to fighting the Coalition. And that didn't happen. Still, I can't believe it has come to this (latest from ABC news on-line):
Latham about to quit, Carr says
A senior Labor figure expects Mark Latham to quit as the federal Opposition Leader due to ill health, possibly within the next 24 hours.
New South Wales Premier Bob Carr has fuelled speculation, saying Mr Latham's recent silence means he has reached a decision to stand down.
Mr Latham has been ill due to severe pancreatitis.
Mr Carr says that if Mr Latham steps down it would be in the best interests of the Labor Party.
He reckons other Labor supporters agree.
Mr Carr is also backing a former federal leader in any leadership spill.
"Well obviously Kim Beazley is available, and he provides the Labor Party with a very obvious choice," he said.
On Southern Cross Radio, Labor frontbencher Wayne Swan also endorsed Mr Beazley.
He says the sooner Mr Latham clarifies his position the better.
Labor's foreign affairs spokesman Kevin Rudd says the Labor Party could become a laughing stock if the crisis is not resolved immediately.
"I'm not going to say black is white and white is black and pretend our current circumstances are in anyway flash, they're not," he said.
"But what we are all needing to see is for Mark to clarify his position and what I think the national leaders of the party at the state level are trying to do is to underline the urgency of that occurring."
Tuesday, January 18, 2005. 12:15pm (AEDT)
I'm not going to speculate about what Latham should or should not have done over the last few weeks, because as much as it pains me to say it, it seems too late for that now. What I am more concerned about is Kim Beazley.
Look, I think most Australians would agree, Beazley is an obviously intelligent, compassionate human being. But do such qualities make a good Parliamentary Leader (some would argue that by definition. leaders must not be human beings at all). Small-l liberals are notorious for just giving in (witness the US Democrats cedeing the 2000 Presidential election). And the fact remains...Beazley has lost two elections. Well, sort of. You may or may not remember, but in the 1998 poll (the "GST election" also the first I voted in) Labor actually won more votes overall, but the Coalition took more seats. Anyway, the Liberals were back in. That hurt, but not too much - I was kind of idealistic at the time and anyway, everyone was sure there'd be a backlash once the GST was introduced.
Well, there was no backlash, and then of course there was the events leading up to the 2001 election...I knew there was no hope Labor would win that. Last October though...finally, I thought, John Howard has to go? Surely people have had enough of the lies and the secrecy and Costello-in-the-wings?
Sadly no.
So, I guess the real question now is, could Beazley possibly win the 2007 election? Impossible from here to say, of course. If a week is a long time in politics...well, so much could happen between now and then. One thing does stand out in my mind though. By the next election Beazley will be 60.
A best case scenario of course would be Latham saying "I'm determined to take Labor to the next poll, we will fight hard and we will prevail, and I want you all with me".
But, that seems as likely as me taking up pig shooting. Then there's the prospect of Beazley caretaking for maybe a year, until one of the younger front benchers - Rudd, Swan, Tanner, Gillard? - is deemed to have "earned their stripes" and takes over, maybe to challenge Abbott or Costello at the poll.
There are no easy answers I can see. But I hope I've given you a little to think about, and your opinions on any of this would be most welcome.
Update - 17:30
Well as soon as I published this post I walked home (5 minutes), turned on ABC news radio, and heard straight away, the news. That Latham was resigning, both as Labor Leader and as an MP.
It's a sad day.
I stayed glued to the radio, listening to the fallout and press conference. Beazley's conference did hearten me, he sounded determined and resolute, so I will put my support there. Rudd gave a press conference too, but he was vauge and refused to commit to running.
Where I Read Mark Latham's Books
Posted on 14 December 2004
by Nico Bell
• 0 Comments
2004 Election Australian politics Books Disability
2004 Election Australian politics Books Disability
I decided to read one of Mark Latham's books. Look, the guy was almost Prime Minister, so I figure someone outside of his immediate family should read one of them.
I started with From the Suburbs, because it happened to be at Charlestown Library. But really, who colud fail to be intrigued by a book with chapter titles like "Reinventing Collectivism"?
Anyway, reading the book, I was at first slightly engaged but then, well...utterly bewildered. I just could not figure out what the guy was on about. To put it crudely, he seemed to use big words for the sake of using big words. I felt he should have ended every paragraph by writing "SEE WHAT A GREAT INTELLECT I AM?!"
Some quotes:
"(an) abstract lifestyle has prduced an abstract style of politics. Symbolic and ideological campaings are given top priority. This involves a particular methodology: adopting a predetermined position on issues then looking for evidence that supports that position."
Huh?
"(Labor party reform) is now happening under Simon Crean's leadership. His theme of modernism is music to my ears."
Which is why Latham continually undermined Crean's leadership.
"This approach is set out in my book What Did You Learn Today? (2001). It is a Third Way program for Australia's transition to a learning society."
Yes he plugged his own book in his own book.
And my favourite:
"The Prime Minister's best mate is Donald McDonald, so Howard made him Chairman of the ABC. Peter Costello's best mate is Michael Kroger, so he put him on the Board. If Tony Abbott had any mates they'd be on the Board of the ABC as well."
Well, you've been warned. If you read any of Mark Latham's books, don't come crying to me!
I started with From the Suburbs, because it happened to be at Charlestown Library. But really, who colud fail to be intrigued by a book with chapter titles like "Reinventing Collectivism"?
Anyway, reading the book, I was at first slightly engaged but then, well...utterly bewildered. I just could not figure out what the guy was on about. To put it crudely, he seemed to use big words for the sake of using big words. I felt he should have ended every paragraph by writing "SEE WHAT A GREAT INTELLECT I AM?!"
Some quotes:
"(an) abstract lifestyle has prduced an abstract style of politics. Symbolic and ideological campaings are given top priority. This involves a particular methodology: adopting a predetermined position on issues then looking for evidence that supports that position."
Huh?
"(Labor party reform) is now happening under Simon Crean's leadership. His theme of modernism is music to my ears."
Which is why Latham continually undermined Crean's leadership.
"This approach is set out in my book What Did You Learn Today? (2001). It is a Third Way program for Australia's transition to a learning society."
Yes he plugged his own book in his own book.
And my favourite:
"The Prime Minister's best mate is Donald McDonald, so Howard made him Chairman of the ABC. Peter Costello's best mate is Michael Kroger, so he put him on the Board. If Tony Abbott had any mates they'd be on the Board of the ABC as well."
Well, you've been warned. If you read any of Mark Latham's books, don't come crying to me!
Election 2004 Hangover
Posted on 10 October 2004
by Nico Bell
• 0 Comments
2004 Election Australian politics Howard Government
2004 Election Australian politics Howard Government
What words can be used to describe how I feel right now?
Devastated. Inconsolable. Gutted.
Sitting in an internet cafe bawling, and I can't help it.
An increased majority. Not just that. Control of the Senate. Can anyone remember that before?
Last night, as the news came through, I kept up a pleasant face because I didn't want to spoil Brooke's birthday (otherwise a great night; I'll tell you about it when I calm down). But this morning, listening to the radio I just couldn't help myself, startling my cat by punching the wall and sobbing. I just wanted Labor to win so badly. I want to go to the house of every person who voted Liberal, shake them and ask WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU? For once I just wanted us stiffs to get a break. I want to yell at everyone else in the boiler room here, who are playing games as if everything was okay.
Goodbye Xander. When their winter is over, I'll be looking for the number for Aer Lingus.
Devastated. Inconsolable. Gutted.
Sitting in an internet cafe bawling, and I can't help it.
An increased majority. Not just that. Control of the Senate. Can anyone remember that before?
Last night, as the news came through, I kept up a pleasant face because I didn't want to spoil Brooke's birthday (otherwise a great night; I'll tell you about it when I calm down). But this morning, listening to the radio I just couldn't help myself, startling my cat by punching the wall and sobbing. I just wanted Labor to win so badly. I want to go to the house of every person who voted Liberal, shake them and ask WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU? For once I just wanted us stiffs to get a break. I want to yell at everyone else in the boiler room here, who are playing games as if everything was okay.
Goodbye Xander. When their winter is over, I'll be looking for the number for Aer Lingus.
Election Day 2004
Posted on 09 October 2004
by Nico Bell
• 0 Comments
2004 Election Australian politics Howard Government
2004 Election Australian politics Howard Government
Let's get right down to it.
I am so worried I feel almost ill.
Three more years? Peter Costello PM? Unbearable. I am handing out how to vote cards this afternoon for Jill Hall, sitting ALP member for Shortland. This is a safe Labor seat, but I have to do something.
Look, I feel so strongly about this. Dole diaries? Pre-emptive strikes? Mandatory detention? I confess I have become ashamed of my adoptive homeland. So much so, that if the Coalition gets back in, I will most likely move back to Ireland.
This will be an enormous wrench. Leaving behind the city I adore, where I have almost everything to stay for. My friends, my beaches, sour fruit roll-ups, I'd abandon them all, to go somewhere cold that I've spent barely a month in since we emigrated in '81? Yes I would do this. I just couldn't live with myself otherwise.
I am so worried I feel almost ill.
Three more years? Peter Costello PM? Unbearable. I am handing out how to vote cards this afternoon for Jill Hall, sitting ALP member for Shortland. This is a safe Labor seat, but I have to do something.
Look, I feel so strongly about this. Dole diaries? Pre-emptive strikes? Mandatory detention? I confess I have become ashamed of my adoptive homeland. So much so, that if the Coalition gets back in, I will most likely move back to Ireland.
This will be an enormous wrench. Leaving behind the city I adore, where I have almost everything to stay for. My friends, my beaches, sour fruit roll-ups, I'd abandon them all, to go somewhere cold that I've spent barely a month in since we emigrated in '81? Yes I would do this. I just couldn't live with myself otherwise.
Mark Latham Goes Bling Bling
From The Daily Telegraph (and here's me thinking April Fools was two weeks ago):
FEDERAL Opposition leader Mark Latham today promised the young people of Australia more "bling-bling".
Mr Latham made the pledge during a light-hearted interview on Perth's Nova 93.7 FM radio, where he was schooled on how to appear more "cool" than Prime Minister John Howard.
The Labor leader was given a T-shirt emblazoned with a new moniker Lath-Daddy, a pimp-style cap with a feather in it, and a hip-hop theme song: 'Lath-Daddy's in the house. Which house? The Lower House'.
"We're going to take that all the way to Lodge," Mr Latham declared.
The Opposition Leader was told that to win over youthful voters he needed to talk the talk, using phrases like "bling-bling" - an American hip-hop term referring to flashy jewellery.
"Youth of Australia, Labor's policy is bling-bling," said Mr Latham.
"Bling-bling for everyone."
He clearly got the message across, because soon afterwards a listener, Adriana, rang the station to say he had won her vote.
"Bling-bling is the best policy I have had so far," quipped Mr Latham, who also demonstrated his "coolness" by correctly identifying singer Pete Murray as cooler than Anne Murray.
He (Mr Latham) stumbled when asked what was currently considered the new black.
"Gay is the new black," he was informed by the presenters.
Mr Latham also suggested federal Treasurer Peter Costello was in need of an extreme makeover from the cast of Queer Eye For The Straight Guy, but said although Mr Howard's eyebrows were enormous, they were not yet long enough for a comb-over.
AAP
FEDERAL Opposition leader Mark Latham today promised the young people of Australia more "bling-bling".
Mr Latham made the pledge during a light-hearted interview on Perth's Nova 93.7 FM radio, where he was schooled on how to appear more "cool" than Prime Minister John Howard.
The Labor leader was given a T-shirt emblazoned with a new moniker Lath-Daddy, a pimp-style cap with a feather in it, and a hip-hop theme song: 'Lath-Daddy's in the house. Which house? The Lower House'.
"We're going to take that all the way to Lodge," Mr Latham declared.
The Opposition Leader was told that to win over youthful voters he needed to talk the talk, using phrases like "bling-bling" - an American hip-hop term referring to flashy jewellery.
"Youth of Australia, Labor's policy is bling-bling," said Mr Latham.
"Bling-bling for everyone."
He clearly got the message across, because soon afterwards a listener, Adriana, rang the station to say he had won her vote.
"Bling-bling is the best policy I have had so far," quipped Mr Latham, who also demonstrated his "coolness" by correctly identifying singer Pete Murray as cooler than Anne Murray.
He (Mr Latham) stumbled when asked what was currently considered the new black.
"Gay is the new black," he was informed by the presenters.
Mr Latham also suggested federal Treasurer Peter Costello was in need of an extreme makeover from the cast of Queer Eye For The Straight Guy, but said although Mr Howard's eyebrows were enormous, they were not yet long enough for a comb-over.
AAP
Latest Posts